IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 222-2 CWP-16488-2022 (O&M) Date of decision: 02.05.2025 Virender Kumar and another ...Petitioners VERSUS State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Present :- Mr. Vinod Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Tapan Kumar, DAG Haryana. ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) Challenge in the present petition is to the office order No.15918-919 dated 22.11.2021 passed by respondent No.4 whereby the case of the petitioners for fixation of pay at par with their junior has been rejected. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners contends that the issue involved in the present case is covered by the judgment dated 25.03.2025 passed by a Division Bench of this Court in CWP-11710-2014 titled as ‘Sarbans Singh and others Vs. State of Haryana and others’ and other connected case(s). Learned State counsel does not dispute the aforesaid factual position. In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of in terms of the aforesaid judgment dated 25.03.2025 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in Sarbans Singh and others (supra). (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) 02.05.2025 JUDGE Mangal Singh Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No MANGAL SINGH 2025.05.03 09:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document