SADAF KHAN AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIC/16172/2025 · 2025-05-19
Saurabh Srivastava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 59554 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 59554 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:85653 Court No. - 74 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 16172 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sadaf Khan And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ruchita Jain Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.
1. Sri Gaurav Vinayam, Advocate holding brief of Sri Harish Chandra Mishra, Advocate preferred 'vakalatnama' on behalf of respondent no. 5, which is taken on record.
2. Heard Ms. Ruchita Jain, learned counsel for petitioners, Sri Gaurav Vinayam, Advocate holding brief of Sri Harish Chandra Mishra, learned counsel for respondent no. 5 and learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of State- respondents.
3. By means of the present writ petition, a direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in peaceful marital/live-in life of petitioners, has been sought.
4. At the very outset, Sri Gaurav Vinayam, Advocate holding brief of Sri Harish Chandra Mishra, learned counsel for respondent no. 5 stated that an FIR has been lodged in the instant case, which was registered as Case Crime No. 180 of 2025, under Section 87 BNS, Police Station- Sipri Bazar, District- Jhansi, which has been ascertained by learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel, therefore, the writ petition has become infructuous.
5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Order Date :- 20.5.2025 #Vik/- Digitally signed by :- VIKRAM GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad