WP (C) No. 69 Page 1 of 3 Sr. No.34 Supplementary List. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP ( C ) No. 69/2025 CM No. 156/2025 Rubeena Maqbool. …Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through: Mr. M. Saleem Mir, Advocate. Vs. UT of J&K & Ors. ...Respondent(s) Through: CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHD YOUSUF WANI, JUDGE O R D E R 15.01.2025 1. Impugned in the instant writ petition filed under the provisions of Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is the tentative selection list, issued by the respondent No. 4-Zonal Education Officer, Chamkote Karnah, Kupwara, bearing Order No. ZEOC/127- 32/23-24 dated 29.01.2024 to the extent of private respondent No.5. 2. The case setup in the present writ petition is that the respondent No. 4 has issued an Advertisement Notice for engagement of AAYA’s in different schools of Zone Chamkote Kanah including UPS Wanjil Sudpora, Karnah which was responded to by the petitioner along with other candidates and the said respondent No. 4 issued the tentative selection list of the candidates for UPS Wanjil Sudpora, Karnah where under the WP (C) No. 69 Page 2 of 3 petitioner figures at Sr. No. 2 and the private respondent No. 5 at Sr. No.1. 3. It is submitted by the petitioner that the private respondent No. 5 does not belong to the concerned Panchayat Ward and, as such, her selection in the tentative selection list is against the norms of the relevant scheme. It is also averred that the petitioner has approached the concerned authority and has also filed her objections to the tentative selection list but despite elapse of one year, objections have not been considered by the respondents which prompted the petitioner to approach this Court through the medium of instant writ petition for redressal of her grievances. 4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the material placed on record. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the process for engagement of AAYA’s for the UPS Wanjil Sudpora, Karnah is yet to be finalized and is still going on. 6. In view of the nature of controversy involved in the present writ petition, this Court is of the opinion that the instant petition can be disposed of at its threshold stage by passing such orders which will not prejudice the rights of any entitled person/party. 7. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the objections of the petitioner as regards the tentative selection list dated 29.01.2024 to the extent of private respondent No.5 for UPS Wanjil Sudpora, Karnah within a period of seven working days from the date of receipt of WP (C) No. 69 Page 3 of 3 certified copy of this order, provided the selection process has not already been finalized. 8. It is also provided that while considering the objections of the petitioner, respondents shall provide an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner as also the respondent No.5 to put-forth their respective stand(s) in support of their contentions. 9. Disposed of along with connected CM(S) (MOHD YOUSUF WANI) JUDGE SRINAGAR: 15.01.2025 “Abdul Rashid”-+ Whether approved for reporting? Yes/No