Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 59540 (AP)

Ganipineni Rama Naidu v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

CRLP/13298/2025 · 2025-12-29

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010699322025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 13298/2025 Between: 1. GANIPINENI RAMA NAIDU, S/O VENKATA SUBBAIAH AGED 46 YEARS, KAMMA, KAKATIYANAGAR, ONGOLE NOW AT FATFAR GANJ THURPU DELHI. 2. KODURI NAGESWARA RAO, S/O RAGHAVENDRA RAO, AGED 35 YEARS, RAJAKA BY CASTE, KRISHNALANKA, VIJAYAWADA. 3. DOVARI NAGARAJU, S/O BHASKARA RAO, AGED 51 YEARS SC MALA NAGAYALANKA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. ATIURI RAVI KUMAR, S/O BABURAO, AGED 54 YEARS, KAMMA BY CASTE, RTC COLONY PADMANA AUTONAGAR, VIJAYAWADA. 5. KONETI KUMAR REDDY, S/O VENKATAREDDY AGED 46 YEARS REDDY BY CASTE, KUMMARIPALEM VIJAYAWADA. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A.P., AT AMARAVATI. THROUGH THE II TOWN POLICE STATION, ONGOLE. 2. GANIPINENI SUDHA RANI, W/O. KRISHNA MOHAN NAIDU AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, OCC. PRIVATE EMPLOYEE, R/O. D.NO.39-1-1/54, KAKATHIYANAGAR, THURUKAMMAPALEM, ONGOLE, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1. PABBATHI MAHESH Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court Made the Following Order: The instant petition under Section 528 of the BNSS has been filed by the Petitioners/Accused Nos.2, 3, 5, 6 and 7, seeking quashment of proceedings against them in C.C.No.1252 of 2019 on the file of the 2 learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Ongole, for the offences under Sections 323, 506 and 509 read with 34 IPC. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1/State. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petition may be disposed of dispensing with the presence of the petitioners before the trial Court. 4. Considering the submissions made, the criminal petition is disposed of. However, the presence of the Petitioners/Accused Nos.2, 3, 5, 6 and 7 before the trial Court is dispensed with, except on the specific dates as directed by the trial Court. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date : 30.12.2025 ASR 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Crl.P.No.13298 of 2025 Dt.30.12.2025 ASR