Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 59528 (ALL)

SMT TANNU AND ANOTHER v. State of UP AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/15196/2024 · 2025-02-23

Vinod Diwakar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:27029 Court No. - 76 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 15196 of 2024 Petitioner :- Smt Tannu And Another Respondent :- State Of Up And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rabindra Bahadur Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Vinod Diwakar,J. 1. None appeared on behalf of the petitioners even in the revised call nor any adjournment slip has been moved, whereas Shri Arvind Kumar Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the State- respondents is present. 2. Learned Standing Counsel, on the basis of instructions, states that on police verification it's surfaced that the parents of the petitioners have no differences between them. The petitioners are residing at their respective houses. In such circumstances, the relief sought in the instant writ petition has become infructuous. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Order Date :- 24.2.2025 Prajapati Justice Vinod Diwakar Digitally signed by :- RAMKESH PRAJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad