Shaik Ahmad Sharif alias Harif v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
CRLRC/1385/2025 · 2025-12-29
Y Lakshmana Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 59527 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 59527 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1385/2025 ORDER:
Criminal Revision Case has been filed challenging the observations made in order passed by the learned V Additional District and Sessions Judge Guntur in Crl.M.P.No.1385 of 2025 in Cr.No.119/2025 of Pedakurapadu Police Station on 19.09.2025.
2. Heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor.
3. The Petitioner has filed the present Revision Case seeking deletion of certain observations made by the learned Trial Court. However, it is evident that the Trial Court has not passed any interlocutory order, and yet, feeling aggrieved by those mere observations, the Petitioner has approached this Court. Such an approach, without there being any impugned order, filing of Revision Case cannot be sustained in law.
4. When no order has been passed, filing a Revision Case solely on the basis of observations is impermissible. Section 397(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 clearly stipulates that a Revision Case against an interlocutory order is not even maintainable. In the present matter, the Revision Case is misconceived and devoid of merit, and therefore, it does not warrant any interference.
5. In the result, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed. No order as to costs.
2
As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dated:30.12.2025 VTS