Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 59510 (AP)

TELANAKULA ANANTHA VENKATA RAKESH v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/35645/2025 · 2025-12-28

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010685422025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 35645/2025 Between: TELANAKULA ANANTHA VENKATA RAKESH, S/O. NARASIMHA RAO, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 9-75-15, BHEEMANAVARI STREET, KOTHAPETA, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI. 522238 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ANDHRA PRADESH, AMARAVATHI. 522503 3. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, NTR COMMISSIONERATE, ANDHRA PRADESH. 520010 4. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, NTR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 520010 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, GUNADALA P.S. VIJAYAWADA CITY, NTR DISTRICT.520004 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. CHALLA AJAY KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent more particularly the 4th and 5th respondent in not completing the investigation in crime No.102 of 2025 on the file of Gunadala Police Station (5th respondent) Dated 04-08-2025 as illegal, arbitrary unconstitutional and violation of constitution of India directing and consequently direct the 2 respondents more particularly 4th and 5th respondents to complete the investigation in crime No.102 of 2025 on the file of Gunadala Police Station (5th respondent) Dated. 04-08-2025 and for other incidental relief.” 2. Sri Challa Ajay Kumar, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that, despite registration of Crime No.102 of 2025 on the file of Gunadala Police Station for the offences under Sections 303(2) and 324(5) read with 3(5) of BNS, the Police did not choose to conclude the investigation and file a report. 3. Sri P.Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that the investigation in the said crime is almost completed and the Police may file report in this matter as early as possible. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, Police are directed to conclude the investigation in Crime No.102 of 2025 on the file of Gunadala Police Station and file a report in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:29.12.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.35645 of 2025 Dt.29.12.2025 Dinesh