APHC010712092025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 36440/2025 Between: 1. GOGULA SUBBAMMA, W/O. LATE GOGULA VENKATESU @ GOGULA BALA VENKATESU, AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, R/O. 1-3- 355, CHENNAREDDY COLONY, PULIVENDULA., Y.S.R. KADAPA DISTRICT. 2. GOGULA VARALAKSHMI,, W/O., VENKATA CHALAM, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS., R/O. 1-3-216, CHENNAREDDY COLONY, PULIVENDULA., Y.S.R., KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, , REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY., MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS., VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 522238 2. THE PULIVENDULA MUNICIPALLITY, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER., PULIVENDULA., Y.S.R. KADAPA DISTRICT.516391 3. TOWN SURVEYOR, PULIVENDULA MUNICIPALITY., PULIVENDULA.,Y.S.R. KADAPA DISTRICT 516391 4. SMT G LAKSHMI DEVI, W/O. RAMA SUBBA REDDY., AGED MAJOR., R/O. RAMESWARAM VILLAGE., PRODDATUR TOWN MANDAL., Y.S.R. DISTRICT 516360 2 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 2 and 3 in trying to dispossess and demolish the house of the 1st petitioner and the land of the 2nd petitioner to an extent of 290.40 Sq. Yards situated at Sy.No. 32/1 bearing Door No. 1-3-355 of Chennareddy Colony, Pulivendula, YSR Kadapa District within Pulivendula Municipality, without issuing any notice or passing any orders and as arbitrary, illegal, improper and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents herein not to demolish the house and dispossess the petitioners from the land to an extent of 290.40 Sq. Yards situated at Sy.No. 32/1 bearing Door No. 1-3-355 of Chennareddy Colony, Pulivendula, YSR Kadapa District within Pulivendula Municipality and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondent herein not to demolish the house and dispossess the petitioners from the land to an extent of 290.40 Sq. Yards situated at Sy.No. 32/1 bearing Door No. 1-3-355 of Chennareddy Colony, Municipality Pulivendula, YSR Kadapa District within Pulivendula , pending disposal of the writ petition and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. V V N NARASIMHAM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: The petitioners are aggrieved by the alleged action of the respondent Nos.2 and 3 in trying to dispossess the 1st petitioner and demolish her house and trying to take over the land of the 2nd petitioner. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that respondent Nos. 2 and 3 could not have sent their men, who are holding out threats of dispossession and demolition, without issuing any prior notice. 3. It is submitted that the 4th respondent is instigating the respondent Nos.2 and 3 and at the behest of the 4th respondent, the 2nd respondent is interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners peaceful possession over the subject property, who have purchased the property vide registered sale deeds. 4. Sri G. Lakshmi Narayana, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent Nos.2 and 3, on written instructions dated 30.12.2025, submits that the 3rd respondent has received a requisition on 13.11.2025 from the adjacent land owners and the 4th respondent, for conducting the survey and fixation of boundaries of the land belonging to the 4th respondent. 5. It is submitted that the 4th respondent is seeking a survey to be conducted in the land admeasuring an extent of Ac.0.08 cents of land in 4 Sy.No.32/2 of Pulivendula Village and has also enclosed the relevant title documents. 6. It is submitted that the 2nd petitioner refused to receive the notice issued by the 3rd respondent dated 12.12.2025 for conducting the survey and that till date, the survey could not be conducted. 7. It is also submitted that men from the respondent Nos.2 and 3 have visited the subject property in which the 3rd respondent is initiating survey proceedings based on the request of the 4th respondent. The Notice issued by the 3rd respondent dated 12.12.2025 issued to the 4th respondent and other concerned is placed on record by the learned Standing Counsel. 8. Considering the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent Nos.2 and 3, quitas can be put to the dispute, by directing the 3rd respondent to complete the survey and demarcate the property of the petitioners and the 4th respondent by duly taking into consideration the title documents submitted by the petitioners as well as by the 4th respondent. The petitioners and the 4th respondent shall cooperate with the survey and submit all relevant documents relating to the subject property claimed by the respective parties. Needless to mention that the survey shall be completed within a period of eight (08) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order. 5 9. In the above observations, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N SCH 6 223 HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N Writ Petition No.36440 of 2025 Date: 30.12.2025 SCH