Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:4343
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s
order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
BA2/95/2025 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.
1. Mr. Mukesh Kaparwan, learned counsel for the applicant.
2. Ms. Pushpa Bhatt, learned Addl. Advocate General for the State.
3. This is second bail application and first bail application was rejected by this Court on 20.02.2025.
4. Present applicant - Neeraj, is seeking bail in relation to FIR/ Case Crime No. 383 of 2024, dated 18.09.2024 lodged at P.S. Ranipur District Haridwar wherein the present applicant has been implicated for the offences punishable under Sections 178, 179, 180, 181, 182, 61(2) of BNS 2023.
5. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that as per prosecution story, main accused is Mohit and other co –accused namely Anantveer Singh and Nikhil Kumar were already enlarged on bail and the role assigned to the present applicant is similar to co – accused namely Anantveer Singh and Nikhil Kumar.
6.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that present applicant has criminal history of three cases, in all the three cases he has already been bailed out.
7. On the other side, learned State Counsel has not disputed that applicant has been implicated earlier in three criminal cases, in which, applicant is already bailed out and co –accused namely Anantveer Singh and Nikhil Kumar were already enlarged on bail.
8. Ms. Bhatt further submits that some stringent conditions be imposed while considering bail application taking into account his past history.
9. After hearing the arguments of learned counsel for the parties and further taking into consideration that applicant is already bailed out in other three criminal cases registered against him and co –accused namely Anantveer Singh and Nikhil Kumar were already enlarged on bail, therefore, this Court is of the view that applicant deserves for bail but keeping in view the past history of the applicant, this Court is imposing some stringent condition.
10. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, the second bail application is
2025:UHC:4343 allowed.
11. Let the applicant ‘‘Neeraj” be released on bail on furnishing his personal bond and two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the following condition: i. After being released on bail, applicant shall surrender his passport, if any, within a week. ii. After being released on bail, applicant shall report to the nearest police station in every 15 days and the SHO concerned shall record his presence. iii. If the applicant is found to be indulged in similar activity, then the prosecution is free to move an application for cancellation of bail.
(Rakesh Thapliyal, J.)
23.05.2025. SKS