SAMIR KUMAR GHOSAL v. BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION & ORS
MAT/1581/2019 · 2025-12-03
Madhuresh Prasad, Prasenjit Biswas
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 59489 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 59489 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
03.12.2025 (D/L-11) Ct. No.4 (B.K.N.) M.A.T. 1581 of 2019
Sri Samir Kumar Ghosal Vs. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. & Ors.
Mr. Sanjib Kr. Mal, Mr. Bimalendu Das, Ms. Shomrita Das
...for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 6
Mr. D. Saha Roy, Sr. Adv., Mr. Subhankar Das
...for the Respondent Nos. 8 & 9
On 26.11.2025 when the matter was taken up there was none to represent the appellant, nor any prayer was made for accommodation. The situation is same today. There is none to represent the appellant, nor any prayer for accommodation. We are, therefore, of the prima facie opinion that the appellant has lost interest in the proceedings. The appeal is accordingly dismissed for default.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J.)
(Prasenjit Biswas, J.)