Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 59488 (AP)

KOTI VENU BABU v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

CRLP/9023/2022 · 2025-12-28

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010617342022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 9023/2022 Between: 1. KOTI VENU BABU, S/O SURYANARAYANA RAO, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, RIO D.NO.41-2017-16, BEACH ROAD, KRISHNALANKA, VLJAYAWADA-520 013 2. SMT. KOTI KUSUMA,, W/O VENU BABU, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, R/O D.NO.9-171, KOTE VARI STREET, NEAR WATER TANK, PRASADAMPADU, VIJAYAWADA RURAL. 3. KOTI SURYANARAYANA RAO,, S/O SIMHACHALAM, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/O D.NO.10-14-19, AKULA VAN STREET, MALLIKARJUNAPET, VIJAYAWADA-520 001 4. KOTI ANURADHA,, W/O SURYANARAYANARAO, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, D.NO. 10-14-19, AKULA VARI STREET, MALLIKARJUNAPET, VIJAYAWADA-520 001 5. KOTI NAVEEN, , S/O SURYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 10-14-19, AKULA VARI STREET, MALLIKARJUNAPET, VIJAYAWADA-520 001 ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI 2. SMT KOTI PUJITHA, W/O KOTI VENU BABU, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 41-20/7-16, BEACH ROAD, KRISHNALANKA, 2 VIJAYAWADA-520 013 ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1. P DURGA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 2. VARALAKSHMI ANAM The Court made the following ORDER: The instant petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., has been filed by the Petitioners/Accused No.1 to 5, seeking quashment of proceedings in C.C.No.2789 of 2019 on the file of the Court of the II Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that no cause survives for adjudication in the Criminal Petition and the matter has become infructuous. 3. Recording the said submissions, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________ Dr.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 29.12.2025 ASR 3 31 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Crl.P.No.9023 of 2022 Dt.29.12.2025 ASR