Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48001 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-453 Year-2024 Thana- SINGHESHWAR District- Madhepura ====================================================== Rahul Kumar S/o- Sanjay Kumar Sah @ Sanjay Sah @ Sanjay Kumar Resident of village- Jajhat Sabaila Ward No- 11 PS-Singheshwar District- Madhepura ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. N.K. Agrawal, Sr. Advocate Mr. Kumar Praveen, Advocate Mr. Barun Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State : Ms. Anita Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 05-08-2025 Heard learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S.. 3. As per prosecution case, on the alleged date and time of occurrence, on the order of this petitioner and other co- accused persons, co-accused Sanjay Sah, who was armed with desi katta, shot father of informant and thereafter, on alarm, all the accused persons fled away. 4. It is submitted by learned senior counsel appearing
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48001 of 2025(2) dt.05-08-2025 2/3 on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. Even as per F.I.R., this petitioner is only alleged to be one of the order giver. It is further submitted that fard beyan of informant was recorded at 23:24 hours on 14.11.2024 in which there is no whisper against this petitioner but subsequently, in the written application which was given before the Office in Charge of Singheshwar Police Station, informant changed his earlier version and stated that name of this petitioner along with other co-accused persons. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and nature of accusation, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is allowed. 7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.
10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhepura in connection with Singheshwar P.S. Case No. 453 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2)
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48001 of 2025(2) dt.05-08-2025 3/3 of the B.N.S.S.
shashank/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T