Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 59464 (BOM)

KAVITA W/O. VIJAY MUNDE AND ANR v. NILESH S/O. TANAJI SAKHARE AND ANR

APEAL/630/2018 · 2025-11-18

Shri Sushil M Ghodeswar

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

630.18apeal (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 924 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 630 OF 2018 KAVITA W/O. VIJAY MUNDE AND ANR VERSUS NILESH S/O. TANAJI SAKHARE AND ANR ….. Ms U. S. Bhosale, Advocate for Respondent No.1 Mr C. V. Bhadane, APP for Respondent No.2/State ….. CORAM : SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J. DATE : 18 NOVEMBER 2025 P. C. : 1. None is present for the appellant. 2. This appeal was filed challenging the order dated 02/08/2018, passed in Criminal M.A. No.311/2018, wherein the learned Sessions Court had granted bail to respondent No.1 in Crime No.134/2018, which was registered with Parli Gramin Police Station, Taluka Parli, Dist. Beed. The said crime was registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. 3. Ms Bhosale, learned Advocate for respondent No.1 and learned APP for respondent No.2, after having gone through the 2025:BHC-AUG:31786 630.18apeal (2) matter, state that accused/respondent No.1 is acquitted by the learned Sessions Court vide the order dated 30/03/2022 and this matter has become infructuous. 4. In view of the above, this appeal is dismissed as infructuous. [SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.] sjk