Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 59460 (PAT)

Heena Dixit @ Heena Dikshit v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./46623/2025 · 2025-08-01

Ashok Kumar Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46623 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-100 Year-2024 Thana- RUPAULI District- Purnia ====================================================== Heena Dixit @ Heena Dikshit Daughter of Sri Ramesh Kumar Resident of Chandrehi P.S -Dhamdaha, Dist- Purnea ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. The Additional Director of Police, The Vigilance Investigation Bureau, Bihar, Patna bihar 3. The Superintendent of Police, the vigilance Investigation Bureau, bihar, Patna bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Amit Kumar Anand, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Anil Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 01-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Rupauli P.S. Case no. 100 of 2024 instituted for the offence under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code. 3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner got appointment on the post of teacher on the basis of forged caste certificate. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46623 of 2025(2) dt.01-08-2025 2/2 that petitioner has already been terminated from service vide letter no. 69 dated 17.09.2023, as contained in Annexure-2. Further submission is that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. 5. Learned APP appearing for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 6. Considering the fact that the petitioner has already been terminated from the service, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Rupauli P.S. Case no. 100 of 2024, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Purnea, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C/ Section 482 (2) of the BNSS. Jagdish/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T