Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5946 (KAR)

THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

MFA/102819/2024 · 2025-02-06

Hanchate Sanjeevkumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 06TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 102819 OF 2024 (LAC) BETWEEN 1 . THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER KARNATAKA NEERAVARI NIGAM LTD., DIVISION MUNDARAGI-582118 ... APPELLANT (By SRI: SHIVARAJ.C.BELLAKKI) AND 1 . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, GADAG-582101 2 . THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUSITION OFFICER SINGATALUR LIFT IRRIGATION PROJECT, HUVINAHADAGALI583219 3 . SMT. HANAMAVVA W/O BASAPPA NIMBANNAVAR AGE: 56 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O. MEVUNDI, TQ.MUNDARAGI, DIST. GADAG-582118 4 . SMT. RENUKA W/O SOMANNA MADAAR AGE: 41 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O. MEVUNDI, TQ. MUNDARAGI, DIST. GADAG-582118 ROOPA PATIL Digitally signed by ROOPA PATIL Date: 2025.06.17 12:08:00 +0530 2 5 . SMT. KASHAVVA D/O BASAPPA NIMBANNAVAR AGE: 37 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O. MEVUNDI, TQ. MUNDARAGI, DIST: GADAG-582118 6 . KENCHAPPA S/O BASAPPA NIMBANNAVAR AGE: 32 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. MEVUNDI, TQ. MUNDARAGI, DIST: GADAG-582118 7 . HALAPPA S/O BASAPPA NIMBANNAVAR AGE: 33 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. MEVUNDI, TQ. MUNDARAGI, DIST: GADAG-582118 8 . SRIKANTH S/O BASAPPA NIMBANNAVAR AGE: 27 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. MEVUNDI, TQ. MUNDARAGI, DIST: GADAG-582118 …RESPONDENTS * * * * * This Miscellaneous First Appeal filed Under Section 73(1) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, against the Judgment and Award dated 02.04.2024 passed in LAC No.314/2019 on the file of The Additional District and Sessions Judge Gadag. This appeal coming on for orders this day, the Hon’ble Court passed the following; 3 O R D E R Finally four weeks time is granted for compliance of office objections, failing which, the appeal stands dismissed without reference to the Court. SD/- JUDGE //COPY// As per the endorsement made in the order sheet dated 07.04.2025, the Advocate for appellant has not complied with the office objections. Hence, this MFA No. 102819 of 2024 stands dismissed as per the Court order dated 06.02.2025. BY ORDER OF THE COURT SD/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR. T By: vg C By: sdp