Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 59454 (AP)

Gollapudi Appa Rao v. The Nandigama Nagara Panchayat Nandigama

WP/46147/2018 · 2025-12-25

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010953602018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 46147/2018 Between: 1. GOLLAPUDI APPA RAO, S/O RAMALINGAM AGED ABOUT 63YRS, OCC. BUSINESS R/O FLAT NO.404, GOODWILL RESIDENCY CHANDARLAPADU ROAD, NEAR TM KALYANAMANDAPAM NETAJI NAGAR, RYTUPETA, NANDIGAMA KRISHNA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE NANDIGAMA NAGARA PANCHAYAT NANDIGAMA, KRISHNA DISTRICT REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER 2. THE ANDHRA PRADESH CAPITAL REGULATORY DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, VIJAYAWADA KRISHNA DISTRICT REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE TAHSILDAR, NANDIGAMA, KRISHNA DISTRICT 4. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT 5. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 6. SURYADEVARA CHALAMAIAH, S/O SATYANARAYANA R/O BESIDE TTD KALYANAMANDAPAM VIJAYA TALKIES ROAD, NANDIGAMA KRISHNA DISTRICT 7. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NANDIGAMA POLICE STATION 2 NANDIGAMA, KRISHNA DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SHARAT CHANDRA A Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 3. Sireesha Rani Vallabhaneni,Standing Counsel For Municipalities 4. P PRABHAKAR RAO 5. M MANOHAR REDDY (SC FOR MUNC AND MUNC CORP ) 6. S PRANATHI 3 The Court made the following ORAL ORDER : None present for the Writ Petitioner. 2. Heard Ms. V. Sireesha Rani, learned Standing Counsel for Municipalities, Sri B. Ramesh, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, Sri A. Ram Dheeraj, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Ms. S. Pranathi, learned Standing Counsel for APCRDA. 3. There is no representation on behalf of the Writ Petitioner on 02.01.2019, 18.08.2020, 01.09.2020, 08.09.2020 and 13.10.2020. Today also there is no representation on behalf of the Writ Petitioner. 4. Having noted the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. There shall be no Order as to costs. 5. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this Order. __________________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 26.12.2025 SSA