Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:82817 Court No. - 80 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 1456 of 2025 Applicant :- Manju Lata Pandey And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Arvind Kumar Upadhyay,Dilip Kumar Yadav,Nishtha Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J. 1. This application under Section 529 B.N.S.S. has been filed with a prayer to direct the court concerned to decide the Case No. 114 of 2020 (Manju Lata Pandey & Anr. vs. Rakshant Dwivedi), under Sections 128 Cr.P.C., Police Station Robertsganj, District Sonebhadra,, pending in the Court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Sonebhadra, expeditiously within stipulated period. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants as well as learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant no. 1 is the wife and applicant no. 2 is the minor son of the opposite party no.2. In the proceeding under Section 125 Cr.P.C. initiated by the present applicant an order was passed against the opposite party no.2 to pay Rs. 5000/- per month as maintenance to the applicant. It is also submitted that when no amount was paid by the opposite party no.2, the applicant was compelled to move an application under Section 128 Cr.P.C. but the same is still pending and as a matter of fact no amount of maintenance has been paid to the applicant so far. It is further submitted that the case may be decided as expeditiously as possible. 4. Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer. 5. I have considered the submissions and perused the record. 6. In that view, since this matter is related with the aggrieved wife and her minor son, who are at the stage of starvation and no maintenance allowance was paid by the opposite party no. 2, the Court concerned is directed to make all endeavors for the expeditious disposal of the aforesaid case, preferably within a period of three months from today, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is also made clear that the Court / Presiding Officer is not the only stake holder in the trial and disposal of a case, hence, besides the P.O. concerned, all the stake holders i.e. police and executive authorities, counsels, parties to the case, staff etc. are also made bound by this order and it will be their responsibility also to assist the Court in every manner for the expeditious disposal of this case. 8. With the above observations, the application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 17.5.2025 Ruhi H. Digitally signed by :- RUHI HASAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- RUHI HASAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad