Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CWP-14314-2025
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
137
CWP-14314-2025
Date of Decision: 19.05.2025
Dev Ashish
…Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana and others
…Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA
Present:- Mr. K.D.S. Hooda, Advocate for the petitioner
TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral)
The petition has been filed inter alia seeking a writ of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 15.04.2024, Annexure P-6, passed by respondent no.3, whereby the petitioner has been held ineligible for conveyance allowance despite being physically handicapped.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, the petitioner will be satisfied in case he is permitted to file a fresh representation raising the grievance as has been raised in the instant petition, and the petition may be disposed of by directing the respondents to decide the same in a specified period.
3.
Notice of motion.
4.
Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents/State, and submits that in case any such representation is filed by the petitioner within a period of two weeks from today, the same will be considered and decided by respondent no.2-Director, PAYAL 2025.05.20 18:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment
CWP-14314-2025
-2-
Secondary Education , by passing a speaking/reasoned order in accordance with law, within three months of receiving the representation.
5.
In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms of thereof.
6.
Ordered accordingly.
7.
In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the officer concerned shall pay costs of ₹50,000 to the petitioner.
(TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA)
JUDGE 19.05.2025 Payal Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
PAYAL 2025.05.20 18:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment