GHULAM MOHAMMAD MIR v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (REVENUE)
WP(C)/52/2025 · 2025-01-03
Rajnesh Oswal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5945 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5945 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sr. No. 11 Supplementary List.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
WP ( C ) No. 52/2025 Gh. Mohd Mir. …Applicant(s)/Appellant(s) Through: Mr. M. Ashraf Malik, Advocate. Vs. UT of J&K & Ors. ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Alla-ud-din Ganai, AAG.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE
O R D E R 03.01.2025
The short grievance agitated by the petitioner in the present writ petition is that the respondents are not issuing the formal license/NOC to the petitioner for operating the Rice Husking Machine. Petitioner has placed on record the communication addressed by the Dy. Commissioner, Budgam to Tehsildar Budgam with regard to the application filed by the petitioner for issuance of license/NOC for operating the Rice Husking Machine. In view of the prayer made in the present petition, the same is taken on board and is disposed of at its threshold with a direction to the respondent No. 2 to decide the application of the petitioner in accordance with law within a period of two weeks from the date, certified copy of this
order is made available to the respondent No.2.
Disposed of along with connected CM(s).
(RAJNESH OSWAL)
JUDGE SRINAGAR: 03.01.2025
“Abdul Rashid” Abdul Rashid Ganaie I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document