Sri. T.Srinivasulu v. The State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Principal Secretary
WP/33235/2014 · 2025-09-11
Harinath N
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5945 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5945 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010053332014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 33235/2014 Between:
1. SRI. T.SRINIVASULU, S/O. RAMANAIAH, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, OCC : BUSINESS, R/O.
D.NO. 26/3/353, JYOTHINAGAR, VEDAYAPALEM, NELLORE - 4. 2. SRI. SK. JABEEN, W/O. KHADER BASHA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCC : BUSINESS, R/O. D.NO. 26/3/352, JYOTHINAGAR, 1ST STREET,VEDAYAPALEM, NELLORE - 4. 3. SMT. K.VIMALA, W/O. SRI. K.VENKATA NARSA REDDY AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, OM : BUSINESS, R/O. D.NO. 26/2/205, 4TH STREET, VEDAYAPALEM, NELLORE - 4. 4. SRI. K.VENKATA KRISHNA, S/O. DAMODARAM, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, OCC : BUSINESS, R/O. D.NO. 26/1/36, CURRENT OFFICE CENTRE, VEDAYAPALEM, NELLORE - 4. 5. SRI. BALASWAMY REMEOUS, S/O. B.M.RAJU, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, OCC : BUSINESS, R/O. D.NO. 26/1/39/4, GAYATRINAGAR, NELLORE - 4. 6. SRI. MD. AMEERUDDIN, S/O. MD.MASUM SAHEB, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC : BUSINESS, R/O.
D.NO. 26/1/39, GAYATRINAGAR, NELLORE - 4. 7. SRI. B.BHASKAR, S/O. B.VENKATA SUBBAIAH, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, OCC : BUSINESS, R/O. D.NO. 26/1/37, GAYATRINAGAR, NELLORE - 4. 2
8. SRI. N.SESHAGIRI, S/O. N.SUNDARAIAH, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, OCC : BUSINESS, R/O. D.NO. 26-1-38, CURRENT OFFICE CENTRE, GAYATRINAGAR, NELLORE - 4. 9. SRI. V.CHANDRAMOULI, S/O. CHANGALRAYULU, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, OCC : BUSINESS, R/O. D.NO. 26-1-39, CURRENT OFFICE CENTRE, GAYATRINAGAR, NELLORE - 4. 10. SRI. B.SANJEEVARAYUDU, S/O. B.RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, OCC : BUSINESS, RIO. D.NO. 26-2-1412, RAMALAYAM STREET, VENKATREDDY NAGAR, VEDAYAPALEM, NELLORE - 4. 11. SMT. K.SRIDEVI, W/O. LATE SRINIVASULA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC : BUSINESS, R/O. D.NO. 26-1-43, CURRENT OFFICE CENTRE, VEDAYAPALEM, NELLORE - 4. 12. SRI. N.RANGANNA, S/O. NARSIMHULU, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC : BUSINESS, RIO. D.NO. 25-2-808, SAVITRINAGAR, OPP: SBI, VEDAYAPALEM, NELLORE - 4. 13. SMT. B.PADMAMMA, W/O VEERASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, OCC : BUSINESS, R/O. D.NO. 26/2/1272, SANKARAN COLONY, NEAR AYYAPPA TEMPLE, VEDAYAPALEM, NELLORE -
4. 14. SMT. B.SUSHEELAMMA, W/O. VENKATACHALAM, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC : BUSINESS, RIO. D.NO. 26/11/1243/1B, JYOTHINAGAR, VEDAYAPALEM, NELLORE - 4. 15. SRI. Y. KRISHNAMURTHY, S/O. Y.VENKATESWARIU, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, 0CC : BUSINESS, RIO. D.NO. 25/2/838, SAVITRINAGAR, VEDAYAPALEM, NELLORE - 4. 16. SRI. A. BALAKRISHNA, S/O. CHENCHALAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC : BUSINESS, RIO. D.NO. 26/2/1441, JYOTHINAGAR, VEDAYAPALEM, NELLORE - 4. ...PETITIONER(S) AND
1.
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, (MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION), SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 3
2. THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF NELLORE REP BY, MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 3. THE TOWN PLANNING OFFICER, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 5. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 6. THE TAHSILDAR, NELLORE MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 7. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. K PALLAVI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME (AP)
2. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
3. GP-MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP)
4. A S C BOSE (SC FOR MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS AP) The Court made the following:
4
ORDER:-
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that, though the respondent authorities proposed to take up the construction on GNT road and to mark certain portions of the petitioner’s property. Subsequently, that plan was shelved and the survey report was discarded.
2. It is also stated in the written instructions that any further proposed road-widening activity would be in accordance with the procedure of law.
3. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is closed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date: 12.09.2025 SR