Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 59445 (ALL)

ABHITAM v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/9369/2025 · 2025-07-10

Ajit Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:110918 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9369 of 2025 Petitioner :- Abhitam Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohammad Umar Khan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, the petitioner has questioned the order of punishment passed by the disciplinary authority as well as the order passed by the Appellate Authority affirming the same. 3. A preliminary objection has been raised by learned Standing Counsel regarding maintainability of this petition that the petitioner has alternative efficacious remedy under the relevant punishment and appeal Rules, 1991. 4. In view of the above, I decline to grant indulgence in the matter at the same time I provide that in the event petitioner prefers a revision before the authority within a period of four weeks from today, the same shall be disposed of by the competent authority within a further period of two months. 5. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this petition stands disposed of. Order Date :- 11.7.2025 Deepika Digitally signed by :- DEEPIKA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- DEEPIKA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- DEEPIKA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad