Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010053432021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY. THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JULY ll=> TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE o PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 135 OF 2021 Petition under Article 227 of Constitution of India aggrieved by the order dated 07.01.2021 in I.A.No.427 of 2020 in O.S.No.337 of 2016 on the file of the Court of the Principal Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kakinada, East Godavari District. Between: Pitta Satyavathi, W/o. Late Balaram D.No.43-1-5, Subhash Road, Main Road, Kakinada. Aged 65 years, Occ. Housewife ...Petitioner/Petitioner/Plaintiff AND
1. Narala Varalakshmi, D/o. Ramu, Aged 41 years, Occ. Housewife D.No.9-8-35, Chinnammagari Nilayam, Kamaladevi Street, Kakinada.
2. Pitta Satish Kumar, S/o. Not known to Petitioner Aged 24 years D.No.9-8-35, Chinnammagari Nilayam, Kamaladevi Street, Kakinada.
3. Pitta Harishchandra Prasad, S/o. Not known to Petitioner, D.No.9-8-35, Chinnammagari Nilayam Aged 22 Kamaladevi Street, years Kakinada.
4. Pitta Annapoorna, W/o. Barla Appa Rao, Aged 45 years. Agraharam Ramachandrapuram. ...Respondents/Respondents/Defendants
it lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 of CPC praying that in the circumstances ' Stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay further proceedings in I.A.No.427 of 2020 in O.S.No.337/2016 on the file of Principal Senior Civil Judge, Kakinada during the pendency of above CRP. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI A KRISHNAM RAJU Counsel for the Respondents: NONE APPEARED The Court made the following ORDER:
APHC010053432021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 135/2021 [3505] Between:
1.PITTA SATYAVATHI, W/0. LATE BALARAM, AGED 65 YEARS, OCQ.HOUSEWIFE, ROAD, MAIN ROAD, KAKINADA D.NO.43-1-5, SUBHASH ...PETITIONER AND 1.NARALA VARALAKSHMI, D/0. RAMU, AGED 41 YEARS, D.NO.9-8-35, CHINNAMMAGARI NILAYAM, KAMALADEVI STREET, KAKINADA.
2. PITTA SATISH KUMAR, PETITIONER, CHINNAMMAGARI NILAYAM, KAMALADEVI STREET KAKINADA.
3. PITTA HARISHCHANDRA PRASAD, S/0. NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER, AGED 22 YEARS, D.NO.9-8-35, CHINNAMMAGARI NILAYAM, KAMALADEVI STREET KAKINADA.
4. PITTA ANNAPOORNA, W/0. BARLA APPA RAO, AGED 45 YEARS, AGRAHARAM, RAMACHANDRAPURAM. OCC. HOUSEWIFE S/0. NOT KNOWN TO AGED 24 YEARS, D.NO.9-8-35,
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased tothe
Order dt.07.01.2021 in I.A.No.427 of 2020 in O.S.No.337/2016 on the file of Principal Senior Civil 'Judge, Kakinada, lA NO: 1 OF 2021 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay further proceedings in I.A.No.427/2020 in O.S.No.337/2016 on the file of Principal Senior Civil Judge, Kakinada during the pendency of above CRP and pass Petition under Section 151 CPC Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.AKRISHNAM RAJU Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. The Court made the following:
Ok"* THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 135 of 2021
ORDER: No representation for the petitioner. As can be seen from the e-Courts of District Judiciary, the
2. main suit in O.S.No.337 of 2016 on the file of PrI. Senior Civil Judge, Kakinada, was disposed of by judgment and decree dated
23.02.2023. In view of the same, the cause in the present Civil Revision Petition does not survive. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as
3. infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/- K TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,
1. The Principal Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kakinada, East Godavari District, (with records if any)
2. One CC to Sri. A Krishnam Raju, Advocate [OPUC]
3. The Section Officer, V.R. Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh.
4. Two CD Copies sree
^4^ HIGH COURT DATED:31/07/2025
ORDER CRP NO. 135 OF 2021 DISMISSING THE C.R.P.
AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS