1 2025:CGHC:56503 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 6062 of 2025 Devcharan Patil S/o Late Sansai Patil Aged About 38 Years R/o Village Lakhanpur, Tehsil Bhaiyathan, Distt. Surajpur, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department Of Revenue, Indravati Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - The Commissioner Sarguja Division, Chhattisgarh. 3 - The Collector District Surajpur, Chhattisgarh. 4 - The Sub Division Officer Bhaiyathan Distt Surajpur, Chhattisgarh. 5 - The Tehsildar Bhaiyathan, Distt. Surajpur, Chhattisgarh. 6 - Gulab Kujur D/o Balisyu Kujur Aged About 52 Years R/o Village Karkoti, Tehsil Bhaiyathan, Distt. Surajpur, Chhattisgarh. 7 - Juleta Pankaj D/o Rishi Kumar Aged About 56 Years R/o Village Karkoti, Tehsil Bhaiyathan, Distt. Surajpur, Chhattisgarh 8 - Shanti Ekka D/o Nirmal Ekka Aged About 50 Years R/o Village Karkoti, Tehsil Bhaiyathan, Distt. Surajpur, Chhattisgarh 9 - Silsilya Ekka D/o Jwalin Ekka Aged About 52 Years R/o Village Karkoti, Tehsil Bhaiyathan, Distt. Surajpur, Chhattisgarh ALFIZA BAIG Digitally signed by ALFIZA BAIG Date: 2025.11.21 14:43:17 +0530 2 10 - Johan Kujur S/o Suas Kujur Aged About 67 Years R/o Village Karkoti, Tehsil Bhaiyathan, Distt. Surajpur, Chhattisgarh 11 - Sharmila Singh W/o H.S. Aayam Aged About 55 Years R/o Village Karkoti, Tehsil Bhaiyathan, Distt. Surajpur, Chhattisgarh 12 - Pradhan Guruji Aged About 57 Years, R/o Village Karkoti, Tehsil Bhaiyathan, Distt. Surajpur, Chhattisgarh 13 - Hol Singh Aayam Aged About 58 Years, R/o Village Karkoti, Tehsil Bhaiyathan, Distt. Surajpur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Sudhanshu Upadhyay, Advocate For Respondent no. 1 to 5- State : Mr. Rishabh Bisen, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Justice Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board 20.11.2025 1. The challenge in this writ petition is to the order Annexure P-1 dated 11.08.2025 passed by the Commissioner, Surguja Division/Respondent no. 2, whereby an application for review of its order Annexure P-5 dated 25.02.2025 has been dismissed. 2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the application for review has been erroneously rejected. 3. Per contra, learned counsel for State raises an objection with regard to maintainability of this writ petition. 4. Heard learned counsel for respective parties and perused the documents enclosed along with writ petition. 5. The grievance of petitioner is that the Commissioner, Sarguja Division/respondent no. 2 has dismissed the application for review of order dated 25.02.2025 erroneously. If petitioner is aggrieved on the ground that Commissioner erred in law in dismissing the appeal filed under Section 44(2) of the Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code, 1959, 3 than petitioner is having an efficacious alternate remedy of filing revision under Section 50 of the Code of 1959. 6. In the aforementioned facts of the case, where petitioner is having an efficacious alternate remedy, I am not inclined to entertain this writ petition, accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed reserving liberty with petitioner to avail other alternate remedy available to him under law. 7. Registry is directed to return back the certified copy of documents enclosed along with this writ petition, after retaining photocopy of the same. Certified copy as per rules. sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge alfiza