Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 59428 (KAR)

THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER v. SMT KOUSALYA D/O DORAISWAMY

MFA/100240/2024 · 2025-07-12

Lok Adalath

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE DHARWAD BENCH BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 CONCILIATORS PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R.DEVDAS AND SHRI K.L. PATIL, MEMBER M.F.A.No.100240/2024(MV-D) LOK ADALAT No.644/2025 BETWEEN: THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER CITY DIVISION, N.W.K.R.T.C., GOKUL ROAD, HUBBALLI, R/BY DULY CONSTITUTED AUTHORITY, CHIEF LAW OFFICER, NWKRTC CENTRAL OFFICE, GOKUL ROAD, HUBBALLI. - APPELLANT (BY SHRI M.K. SOUDAGAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1 . SMT. KOUSALYA D/O DORAISWAMY AGE. 42 YEARS, OCC, HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O NO.352, 13TH MAIN, NEAR 7TH CROSS, GOKULA 1ST STAGE, 1ST PHASE, MATHIKERE, BANGALORE 560054. 2 . BHUVAN S/O VINAYAK RANGAREJ AGE. 8 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT, R/O NO.352, 13TH MAIN, NEAR 7TH CROSS, GOKULA 1ST STAGE, 1ST PHASE, MATHIKERE, BANGALORE 560054. SINCE MINOR R/BY HIS NATURAL GUARDIAN MOTHER SMT. KOUSALYA D/O DORAISWAMY RESPONDENT NO.1 2 3 . VASANTSA S/O RANGAPPA RANGAREJ AGE. 70 YEARS, OCC. NIL, R/O OPP. MAYUR RESORT, NAVALUR, DHARWAD 580009. 4 . KALAVATI W/O VASANTSA RANGAREJ AGE. 62 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE HOLD WORK, R/O OPP. MAYUR RESORT, NAVALUR, DHARWAD 580009. - RESPONDENTS (NOTICE TO R1 & R2 IS SERVED) THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 20.07.2023 PASSED IN MVC NO.522/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE IV ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND ADDITIONAL MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL AT DHARWAD, AWARDING COMPENSATION OF Rs.48,30,000/- WITH INTEREST AT 6 PERCENT P.A. FROM THE DATE OF PETITION TILL ITS REALIZATION & ETC. THIS MFA COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE LOK ADALAT AFTER BEING REFFERED BY THE COURT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED: CONCILIATION ORDER Learned counsel for the appellant-Corporation has filed a memo stating that in view of the execution petition filed by the claimants in E.P.No.38/2023, the appellant- Corporation will be satisfying the entire award amount. Therefore, the appellant-Corporation is not intending to proceed with the appeal and the appeal shall be dismissed as not pressed. 3 2. The memo filed by the appellant-Corporation is accepted subject to all just exceptions. 3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed. The amount in deposit, if any, shall be transmitted to the concerned Tribunal, forthwith. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER BVV, CT:VP