IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46329 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-39 Year-2025 Thana- Lokha District- Supaul ====================================================== MD. ABDUL RAHMAN @ ABDUR RAHMAN Son of Late Tahir Karmchari @ Tahir Amin Resident of village - Gangapatti, P.S.- Laukaha, District - Supaul. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nirmal Kumar Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 2 29-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Laukaha P.S. Case No. 39 of 2025 instituted for the offence under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 126(2), 127(2), 115(2), 121(2), 132, 109, 303(2), 324(4), 352 & 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 3. On 21.04.2025, during a protest over Md. Jahangir’s death, a violent mob of villagers, incited by some individuals, attacked police personnel and vandalized a Dial-112 vehicle at Mohania Petrol Pump. The attackers, including 57 named persons and 200–250 unknown others, looted equipment and tried to assault the police. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46329 of 2025(2) dt.29-07-2025 2/3 4. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 27-05-2025. Petitioner bears one criminal antecedent, as per disclosure made in paragraph No. 3 of the bail application. 5. It has been further submitted by the petitioner’s counsel that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. There is no specific allegation levelled against the petitioner, rather allegation is general and omnibus in nature. From perusal of the FIR, it would manifest that petitioner was the member of the mob. No police personnel sustained any injury in the occurrence. Police after completion of investigation has submitted charge sheet in this case. 6. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody of the petitioner, nature of accusation and charge sheet being submitted, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 8. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Laukaha Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46329 of 2025(2) dt.29-07-2025 3/3 P.S. Case No. 39 of 2025. Raj Kishore/- (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) U T