APHC010328792024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 16719/2024 Between: 1. GAJULA NAGA VENKATA MOHAN RAO, S/O. LATE NAGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, SRI SAI RAMA HOTEL, R/O.D.NO. 30-49-2, NANDYALTOWN AND MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER CUM CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, , II TOWN POLICE STATION NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 5. PATIA LAKSHMI DEVI, W/O. SREENIVASULU, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS. HOUSEWIFE, RO. H.NO. 29-178-H8-B-C, SBICOLONY, NANDYAL TOWN AND MANDAL, KURNOOLDISTRICT. 6. MUNIRAJU GOVINDULA PADMAVATHI, WIFE OF N. RAMA SUBBAIAH AGEDABOUT 60 YEARS,HOUSE WIFE, R/O. H.NO. 29/177-1-206, FLAT NO.206, PRUDHVI ADITYA APARTMENTS, SBI COLONY, NANDYAL TOWN AND MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 7. M R G SREENIVASULU, S/O. M.R. GOVINDARAJULU, AGED ABOUT 53YEARS, R/O. H.NO. 3-320, BYRMAL STREET, NANDYALTOWN AND MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. - 8. N RAMA SUBBAIAH, S/O. N. SESHANNA AGEDABOUT 65 YEARS,OCC BUSINESS, R/O. H.NO. 29/177-1-206, FLAT NO.206, PRUDHVI ADITYA APARTMENTS, SBI COLONY, NANDYAL TOWN AND MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly a Writ in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents especially the action of the Respondent No.4 herein in calling the petitioner herein to the police station and in interfering with the civil disputes pending between the petitioner and the Respondents No.5 to 8 and forcing the petitioner to withdraw the suits filed by the petitioner vide O.S. No. 777 of 2021 and O.S. No. 79 of 2021 and further forcing the petitioner to hand over the suit schedule property to act as per the terms and conditions of the Respondents No.5 to 8 is perse illegal, arbitrary, unfair apart from violative of Principles of Natural Justice and violative of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondent No. 4 herein not to call the petitioner to the police station without there being any crime registered against the petitioner and not to interfere in Civil Disputes pending between petitioner and the unofficial respondents and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the official respondents especially respondent no.4 not to harass the petitioner by calling him to the police station and not to interfere in the civil dispute spending between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents without following due process of law pending disposal of the writ petition pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V NITESH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 16719 of 2024 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly a Writ in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents especially the action of the Respondent No.4 herein in calling the petitioner herein to the police station and in interfering with the civil disputes pending between the petitioner and the Respondents No.5 to 8 and forcing the petitioner to withdraw the suits filed by the petitioner vide O.S. No. 777 of 2021 and O.S. No. 79 of 2021 and further forcing the petitioner to hand over the suit schedule property to act as per the terms and conditions of the Respondents No.5 to 8 is perse illegal, arbitrary, unfair apart from violative of Principles of Natural Justice and violative of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondent No. 4 herein not to call the petitioner to the police station without there being any crime registered against the petitioner and not to interfere in Civil Disputes pending between petitioner and the unofficial respondents and pass…” 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the police are interfering with the civil disputes in between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents. Learned counsel would further submit that a direction may be given to the police. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions would submit that based on the complaint made by the petitioner, the police called respondent No.8 to the police station for preliminary enquiry. The police are not interfering in the civil disputes between petitioner and the unofficial respondents. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 6. Recording the above said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents, except under due procedure of law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 30.12.2025. TVN HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.16719 of 2024 Dated.30.12.2025 TVN 280