Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5940 (HP)

VIRBHADER SINGH v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

CWP/3790/2025 · 2025-05-02

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.3796 of 2025 and connected matters Decided on: 02.05. 2025 _________________________________________________________________ 1. CWP No. 3796 of 2025 Sujata Devi ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ 2. CWP No. 3798 of 2025 Manoj Kumar ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ 3. CWP No. 3788 of 2025 Sangeeta Rani ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. …Respondents ____________________________________________________________ 4. CWP No. 3790 of 2025 Virbhader Singh ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ - 2 - 5. CWP No. 3792 of 2025 Sapna Kumari ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ 6. CWP No. 3794 of 2025 Sujata Sharma ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua 1 Whether approved for reporting? _________________________________________________________________ For the petitioners: Mr. Pankaj Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that due to developments that have taken place post the filing of these writ petitions, more specifically the enactment, i.e. The Himachal Pradesh Recruitment and Conditions of Service of 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes - 3 - Government Employees Act, 2024, these writ petitions in the present form, cannot proceed ahead, therefore, the petitioners be permitted to withdraw the present writ petitions with liberty to file afresh in accordance with law, inter alia, assailing the aforesaid enactment. 2. Prayer is accepted. Granting such liberty, the writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn alongwith pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge May 2, 2025 R.Atal