Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5939 (JHR)

MUNDRIKA RAVIDAS ALIAS MUNDRIKA RAM v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./1092/2025 · 2025-02-18

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1092 of 2025 ------ 1. Mundrika Ravidas @ Mundrika Ram, aged about 53 years, son of Chaman Ravidas. 2. Munni Devi @ Muniya Devi, aged about 45 years, wife of Mundrika Ravidas @ Mundrika Ram. Both Resident of village –Horiya, P.O. –Kutipisi, P.S. – Katkamsandi, Dist.-Hazaribag. … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Shailendra Jit, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Vandana Bharti, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 18.02.2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending their arrest, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Katkamsandi P.S. Case No.163 of 2024 registered under sections 74, 109, 115(2), 117(2), 127(1), 127(2), 189(2), 190 & 303 of the B.N.S., 2023. The Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners attempted to murder the informant. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and there was land dispute between the parties. It is then submitted that for the self-same occurrence from the side of the petitioners Katkamsandi P.S. Case No. 164 of 2024 has been instituted. It is further submitted that there was a free fight between the parties and the genesis of the occurrence is a petty land dispute. It is then submitted that the petitioners undertake to furnish sufficient security including cash security and also undertake to cooperate with the investigation of the case and further undertake that they will not annoy or disturb the informant or his family members in any manner during the pendency of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case where the abovenamed petitioners be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Hence, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, they shall be released on bail on depositing cash security of Rs.10,000/- each and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate -1st Class, Hazaribag, in connection with Katkamsandi P.S. Case No.163 of 2024 with the condition that the petitioners will cooperate with the investigation of the case and appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will furnish their mobile number and a copy of their Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that they will not change their mobile number during the pendency of the case with further condition that that they will not annoy or disturb the informant or his family members in any manner during the pendency of the case subject to the conditions laid down under section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Sonu/Gunjan-