Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5939 (BOM)

SANTUKRAO AASARAM KADAM v. S J KUNTHE AND OTHERS

CP/61/2017 · 2025-10-01

Shri N B Suryawanshi, Smt Vaishali Patil Jadhav

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

953 cp 61 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONT. PETITION NO. 61 OF 2017 IN WP/4956/2015 Santukrao Aasaram Kadam VERSUS S. J. Kunthe And Others ... • Mr. A. C. Deshpande, Advocate for the Petitioner – Absent • Mr. K. S. Patil, AGP for Respondent/s – State ... CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND VAISHALI PATIL–JADHAV, JJ. DATE : OCTOBER 01, 2025 P E R C O U R T : 1. None appears for the petitioner, even at the second call. 2. Respondents have filed reply of the Joint Director of Higher Education, Aurangabad Region, Aurangabad stating that revised pension proposal of the petitioner is sanctioned and the same was communicated by letter dated 07.02.2017. The order is, therefore, complied with. 3. Contempt Petition is, therefore, disposed of by accepting the statement made by the respondents on affidavit. [VAISHALI PATIL–JADHAV, J.] [NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.] komal kamble 1/1 2025:BHC-AUG:27860-DB