APHC010690912025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] TUESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 36267/2025 Between: 1. NAGINENI SRINIVASULU, S/O. VENKATESWARLU, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCO AGRICULTURIST, R/O. BOLLAPALLI VILLAGE, ARDHAVEEDU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT -523261. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, A.P SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, AP -522238 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT AT ONGOLE, - 523001 3. THE SUBCOLLECTOR, MARKAPUR DIVISION, MARKAPUR MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. -523316 4. THE MANDAL REVENUE OFFICER, ARDHAVEEDU MANDAL PRAKASAM DISTRICT-523333 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the inaction of the respondents, particularly 4th respondent on my Grievance Petition No. PRA202504216026 dated 21-04- 2025 submitted for granting E-Pattadar Passbook-Cum-Title deed and 2 mutation the petitioners name in all online Web land Record of Rights such as Adangal pahanies, l-B Register connected to the petitioners landed property of Ac. 3.05 cents in Sy.No.417/2 of Bollapalli Village, Ardhaveedu Mandal, Prakasam District and action of respondent 3 and 4 erected the warring board in my land without issuing any notice or any known procedure established by law as illegal, irregular and violations of Principles of Natural Justice and offends under articles 14, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3 and 4 respondent to remove the erected warning board which was erected by the 4threspondent and direct him not to interfere with my peaceful possession and enjoyment of the aforesaid property, and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PAVAN KUMAR PASUPULETI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 36267 of 2025 ORDER:- This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for the following relief: “…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the inaction of the respondents, particularly 4th respondent on my Grievance Petition No. PRA202504216026 dated 21.04.2025 submitted for granting E-Pattadar Passbook-Cum-Title deed and mutation the petitioners name in all online Web land Record of Rights such as Adangal pahanies, l-B Register connected to the petitioners landed property of Ac. 3.05 cents in Sy.No.417/2 of Bollapalli Village, Ardhaveedu Mandal, Prakasam District and action of respondents 3 and 4 erected the warring board in my land without issuing any notice or any known procedure established by law as illegal, irregular and violations of Principles of Natural Justice and offends under articles 14, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3 and 4 respondent to remove the erected warning board which was erected by the 4th respondent and direct him not to interfere with my peaceful possession and enjoyment of the aforesaid propertyand pass…” 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue. 3. The contention of the petitioner is that he is a pattadar and that he made application on 21.04.2025 for mutation of his name for grant of E-Pattadar Passbook, adangal and pahani. Despite the lapse of eight (08) months, the respondents have neither considered the application nor passed any orders thereon. Hence, the present writ petition. 4. In reply to the contentions, the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents, on instructions from the 4th respondent, submitted that 4 the respondents have not denied the grant of patta to the petitioner, However, it is stated that the petitioner had sold the subject property along with possession to third parties through an unregistered sale deed, and based on the said unregistered sale deed, the name of the third party was recorded in the adangal. Accordingly, the authorities have initiated an enquiry. In view of the pendency of the said enquiry, the application filed by the petitioner has not been considered within time. 5. Considering the submissions made by both the learned counsel, this Court is not inclined to go into the merits of the case. The respondents, more particularly the 4th respondent, are directed to consider the application made by the petitioner on 21.04.2025, conclude the enquiry and pass appropriate orders within a period of three (03) months from the date of receipt of the order. 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH Dt.30.12.2025 Pmk 5 146 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 36267/2025 Dt.30.12.2025 Pmk