Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010224362019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] MONDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 9864/2019
Between:
1. TADI GONVINDHA RAO, S/O. SAMBHASIVA RAO AGED YEARS, OCC SENIOR FOREMAN-VIZAG STEEL PLANT, R/O.D.NO. 7-22, DUVVADA, SECTOR-I, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER AND
1. STATE OF AP, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIATE, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, DUVVADA POLICE STATION, DUVVDA VISAKHAPATNAM. 4. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR, LAND ACQUISITION FOR STEEL PLANT, VISAKHAPATNAM. 5. MR KISHORE, INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DUVVDA POLICE STATION,DUVVADA, VISAKHAPATNAM. 6. MR SATYARAO, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER R/O. GANGAVARAM C. MR.KISHORE, INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
DUVVDA POLICE STATION,DUWADA, VISAKHAPATNAM
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in resorting to extra-judicial land dispute settlement in respect of the residential premises of the petitioner by misusing official powers to evict the petitioner from their premises is illegal, arbitrary and one without jurisdiction and tc consequently direct the 3rd respondents not to indulge in land settlemei dispute in any
2 manner in respect of petitioners property bearing Door Number 7-22, Duvvada, Sector-I, Visakhapatnam and to pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2019
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.3not to indulge in land settlement dispute in any manner in respect of petitioners property bearing Door Number 7-22, Duvvada, Sector-I, Visakhapatnam pending disposal of the writ petition and to pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. V V SATISH
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME (AP)
The Court made the following:
3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.9864 of 2019 ORDER:
The present writ petition is filed seeking a direction to the 3rd respondent not to interfere in any manner with the petitioner’s property bearing Door No. 7-22, Duvvada, Sector-I, Visakhapatnam. 2.
Heard Sri G. Saideep, learned counsel representing Sri V.V. Satish, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Sri R. Mallikarjuna Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, representing respondent Nos. 1 to 4. 3. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home placed on record the written instructions dated 29.07.2019 and submitted that upon receipt of the petition from the 6th respondent on 17.07.2019, an entry was made in the Station General Diary at 20:00 hours on the same day. To verify the complaint, the petitioner was contacted over the phone, and both parties appeared before the Station House Officer and produced their documents. After perusal of the same, the dispute was found to be civil in nature, and both parties were advised to seek redressal before the competent civil court. Accordingly, a receipt was issued to the 6th respondent, and an entry was made in the Non- Cognizable Register on 17.07.2019. 4
4. It was further submitted that no case has been registered against the petitioner and that the police have not interfered with the rights or possession of the subject property. Except for advising the parties to approach the competent court, the police have not misused their official position. Hence, it was prayed that the writ petition be dismissed. 5. In light of the submissions made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader, no further orders are necessary in the writ petition. 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed at the stage of admission, without going into the merits of the case. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 29th December, 2025 cbn
5 19 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION No.9864 of 2019
29th December, 2025
cbn