Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:114732 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6900 of 2025 Petitioner :- Deepak Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Jitendra Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking the following main prayers:-
"i) issue writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no. 3, District Inspector of Schools, District- Jaunpur to ensure the payment of salary to the petitioner in the light of the order dated 08.05.2013 passed by Hon'ble Lucknow Bench of this Hon'ble Court in Writ Petition No. (S/S) 579 of 2008 and letter dated 14.07.2015 of the then District Inspector of Schools, District-Jaunpur by speaking and reasoned order within a stipulated period as fixed by this Hon'ble Court. (ii) issue writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no.3 to decide the pending representation dated 18.03.2025 (Annexure No. 11 to the writ petition) of the petitioner with reasoned and speaking order within set time scheduled as directed by this Hon'ble Court."
2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner without entering into merits of the case, made innocuous prayer that he may be permitted to file fresh representation before respondent no.3 and a direction may be issued to him to decide the same in time bound manner.
3. Sri Saurabh, learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents vehemently opposed the writ petition on merit, but has not opposed the prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner.
4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Sri Saurabh, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State-respondents and perused the contents made in the writ petition.
5. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf
of the petitioner as no objection made on behalf of learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents.
Learned counsel for the petitioner is hereby provided to file a fresh representation along with present writ petition as well as certified copy of this order before respondent no.3 within 10 days from today. After receiving the said representation, respondent no.3 is
directed to decide the said representation in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receiving of the said representation.
6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of.
Order Date :- 16.7.2025 Radhika (Chandra Dhari Singh, J.) Digitally signed by :- RADHIKA VISHWAKARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad