DAULAT GENU PATOLE, DIED THR. L.RS. SUSHILABAI AND ORS v. GANESH MARKAD AND ORS
CP/166/2012 · 2025-11-18
Shri Arun R Pedneker
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 59356 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 59356 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE JUDICATURE OF HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 962 CONT. PETITION NO. 166 OF 2012 IN WP/4194/2011 Daulat Genu Patole, Died Thr. L.rs. Sushilabai And Ors VERSUS Ganesh Markad And Ors ... Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Nagode D. G. AGP for Respondents-State: Mr. S. G. Joshi Advocate for Respondents No.1 to 3: Mr. None Present ...
CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. Dated : November 18, 2025.
PER COURT :-
1. The contempt petition alleges that the contemnor has not followed the orders of this Court and has violated the order dated 16/06/2011, whereby a status quo order was granted with respect to the mutation entries.
2. In response to the notice issued, a reply has been filed stating that the status quo order was in operation only till 28/07/2011 and that the subsequent extension of the status quo order was not communicated to him. It is stated that, in the absence of such communication, he acted in terms of the orders of the Deputy Registrar of Land Records and effected the mutation entries. However, upon receiving communication of the further orders of this Court on 28/07/2011, the mutation entries were reversed and the status quo, as directed, was maintained.
3. In view of the affidavit filed, nothing survives in the petition. The petition is, therefore, disposed of.
( ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. ) vj gawade/-. Page
1 of
1 2025:BHC-AUG:31695