126 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Neelam Devi and Others State of Haryana CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present: Mr. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA The the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioners on parity with the similar situated persons who have been allotted fresh stations vide orders dated 26.09.2024 and 30.04.2025, Annexures P 2. Learned counsel fo herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At this stage, the petitioners will be satisfied in case the second respondent is directed to decide the pending representation, dated 29. fied period. 3. Notice of motion. 4. Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana notice on behalf of the respondents/State. On the asking of the Court, Mr. Sanjeev Kaushik, Advocate, accepts notice on submits that the pending representation the second respondent/State IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-14232 Date of Decision :16.05.2025 nd Others Versus f Haryana and Others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Mr. Tejpal Singh Dhull, Advocate for the petitioners. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (ORAL) The petition has been filed seeking a the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioners on parity with the similar situated persons who have been allotted fresh stations vide orders dated 26.09.2024 and 30.04.2025, Annexures P-5 and P Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that grievance raised herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At this stage, the petitioners will be satisfied in case the second respondent is directed to decide the pending representation, dated 29.11.2024, Annexure P Notice of motion. Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana notice on behalf of the respondents/State. On the asking of the Court, Mr. Sanjeev Kaushik, Advocate, accepts notice on the pending representation, dated second respondent/State Project Director, IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 232-2025 Date of Decision :16.05.2025 …Petitioners ….Respondents HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Advocate for the petitioners. seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioners on parity with the similar situated persons who have been allotted fresh stations vide orders dated 5 and P-9, respectively. r the petitioners submits that grievance raised herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At this stage, the petitioners will be satisfied in case the second respondent is directed to 11.2024, Annexure P-7, in a speci- Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents/State. On the asking of the Court, Mr. Sanjeev Kaushik, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent no.2 and , dated 29.11.2024, will be decided by Haryana School Shiksha directing the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioners on parity with the similar situated persons who have been allotted fresh stations vide orders dated r the petitioners submits that grievance raised herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At this stage, the petitioners will be satisfied in case the second respondent is directed to i- accepts notice on behalf of the respondents/State. On the asking of the Court, Mr. behalf of respondent no.2 and will be decided by PUSHPINDER SAINI 2025.05.19 09:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-14232-2025 Pariyojna Parishad, by passing a law within a period of three months 5. In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioners has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. 6. Ordered accordingly. 7. In cas officer concerned shall pay costs of May 16, 2025 ps 2025 -2- Pariyojna Parishad, by passing a speaking/reasoned order in accordance with law within a period of three months. In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioners has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. Ordered accordingly. In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the r concerned shall pay costs of ₹50,000 to the petitioner May 16, 2025 Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable speaking/reasoned order in accordance with In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioners has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. e the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the ,000 to the petitioners. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No speaking/reasoned order in accordance with In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioners e the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) PUSHPINDER SAINI 2025.05.19 09:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document