Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
CMPMO No. 65 of 2023.
Decided on :
22 nd May, 2025.
Padam Pur ...Petitioner. Versus Vinod Kumar & Anr.
....Respondents.
Coram:The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. K.B. Khajuria, Advocate and Mr. Pushpender Kumar, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Abhimanyu Rathore, Advocate.
Satyen Vaidya, Judge (Oral).
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is under instructions to withdraw the instant petition on account of subsequent developments.
2. Prayer being innocuous is allowed. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(Satyen Vaidya) Judge 22nd May, 2025.
(jai)
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?