Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 59336 (AP)

P RATNAGIRI v. Y SRI LAKSHMI

CC/836/2022 · 2025-12-28

D Ramesh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010122282022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] MONDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH CONTEMPT CASE NO: 836/2022 Between: 1. P RATNAGIRI, AGED 45 YEARS, OCC. CIVIL CONTRACTOR, R/O ADIVARAPUPET, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. Y SRI LAKSHMI, W/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, OCC . PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION DEPT A.P. SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. V SRINIVAS, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, OCC. DIRECTOR OF WORKS AND ACCOUNTS DEPT, IBRAHIMPATNAM MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT, 3. M MALLIKARJUNA NAIK, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, OCC . DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, OFF DMA OFFICE, GORANTLA, GUNTUR, 4. D CHANDRASEKHAR, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, OCC . ELURU MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, ELURU WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be please to punish the Respondents under the provisions of contempt of courts Act for willful, deliberate disobedience of the Honourable court order dated 21.11.2021 in I A No. 1 of 2021 in W.P No. 26923 of 2021 order pass by the Honourable Sri Justice D RAMESH GARU and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P NARAHARI BABU Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. C SUMON 2. MANOHAR REDDY MALLASANI The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH CONTEMPT CASE No:836 OF 2022 ORDER: 1. The learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, has submitted that the orders dated 21.11.2021 in I.A. No.1 of 2021 in W.P. No.26923 of 2021 have been implemented and hence, no further orders are required in this contempt case. 2. Recording the same, the contempt case is closed. No costs. 3. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this contempt case shall stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH Dt.29.12.2025 BV