Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 59322 (CAL)

MALLIKA MONDAL v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA(P)/418/2022 · 2025-12-03

Partha Sarathi Sen, Sujoy Paul

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

03.12.2025 Item No.24 Ct. No.1 PG WPA (P) 418 of 2022 Mallika Mondal Versus The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Pawan Kr. Gupta Ms. Sofia Nesar Mr. Santanu Sett ……….for the petitioner Mr. Jahar Lal De, Ld. AGP Mr. Suddhadev Adak….for the State Ms. Soma Chowdhury Bandhu…..for the SLSA PER, SUJOY PAUL, ACJ. 1. Parties are represented through their respective learned counsel. 2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the relief claimed in the PIL has already been extended and therefore, nothing remains to be adjudicated in this matter. 3. The other side has no objection. 4. Accordingly, the PIL is disposed of. 5. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be furnished to the parties expeditiously upon compliance of all legal formalities. (SUJOY PAUL, ACJ) (PARTHA SARATHI SEN, J.)