Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 59314 (PNJ)

SANDEEP SINGH v. VIRAJ SHYAMKARN TIDKE

COCP/2466/2025 · 2025-08-04

Nidhi Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 104 Sandeep Singh Sh. Viraj Shyamkarn Electoral Officer, Malerkotla, District Malerkotla. CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) proceedings order dated this Court in CWP Election Commission, Punjab and others”, vide which the petition was disposed of with a direction consider pending complaint dated 02.1.2025 (Annexure P petitioner and pass an appropriate reaso with law, preferably within a period of 06 weeks from the date of receipt of copy/production of this order. Viraj Shyamkarn Tidke, Deputy Commissioner COCP-2466-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.2466 of 2025 Date of decision : Sandeep Singh Versus Sh. Viraj Shyamkarn Tidke, Deputy Commissioner Electoral Officer, Malerkotla, District Malerkotla. CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Sunny K. Singla, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.D. Sachdeva, DAG, Punjab. GUPTA J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that proceedings be initiated against the respondent for not complying the order dated 21.2.2025 (Annexure P-1) passed by a this Court in CWP-4972-2025 titled as “ Election Commission, Punjab and others”, vide which the petition was disposed of with a direction “…to respondent No.2 therein to consider pending complaint dated 02.1.2025 (Annexure P petitioner and pass an appropriate reaso with law, preferably within a period of 06 weeks from the date of receipt of copy/production of this order.” Short reply dated 21.7.2025 by way of affidavit of Shri Viraj Shyamkarn Tidke, Deputy Commissioner 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 2466 of 2025 (O & M) Date of decision :-04.08.2025 …..Petitioner Tidke, Deputy Commissioner-cum-District Electoral Officer, Malerkotla, District Malerkotla. …..Respondent HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Sunny K. Singla, Advocate Mr. K.D. Sachdeva, DAG, Punjab. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that contempt against the respondent for not complying the 1) passed by a Division Bench of titled as “Sandeep Singh vs. State Election Commission, Punjab and others”, vide which the petition to respondent No.2 therein to consider pending complaint dated 02.1.2025 (Annexure P-2) of the petitioner and pass an appropriate reasoned order, in accordance with law, preferably within a period of 06 weeks from the date of Short reply dated 21.7.2025 by way of affidavit of Shri Viraj Shyamkarn Tidke, Deputy Commissioner-cum-District Electoral VIJAY ASIJA 2025.08.06 20.14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Officer, Malerkotla, District Malerkotla has already been filed by the State in the Registry. The same is taken on record. Copy thereo supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner. Registry to tag/paginate the same at appropriate place in the paper necessary compliance has been made, while passing dated 13.6.2025 (Annexures R respondent passed in the present petition, the same is August 04 Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No COCP-2466-2025 (O & M) Officer, Malerkotla, District Malerkotla has already been filed by the State in the Registry. The same is taken on record. Copy thereo supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner. Registry to tag/paginate the same at appropriate place in the paper Learned counsel for the respondent necessary compliance has been made, while passing 3.6.2025 (Annexures R-1/1T and R respondent-authority; thus, no cause survives in the present petition. In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition, the same is Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. 4, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No 2 Officer, Malerkotla, District Malerkotla has already been filed by the State in the Registry. The same is taken on record. Copy thereof is supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner. Registry to tag/paginate the same at appropriate place in the paper-book. Learned counsel for the respondent-State submits that necessary compliance has been made, while passing Speaking Orders 1/1T and R-1/1 respectively) by the ; thus, no cause survives in the present petition. In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition, the same is disposed of accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.08.06 20.14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document