APHC010078942023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3207] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1094/2023 Between: 1. BANAVATH MANTRU NAIK, S/O MUNE NAIK, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, RETIRED EMPLOYEE, R/O DOOR NO. 11-31-490/421, 10TH WARD, RAVIPADU ROAD, NARASARAOPET TOWN AND MANDAL, PALANADU DISTRICT -522601 ...PETITIONER AND 1. UNION BANK BHAVAN, 239, VIDHAN BHAVAN MARG, NARIMAN POINT, MUMBAI - 400 021, MAHARASHTRA, INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR CUM CEO MS. MANI MEKHALAI 2. UNION BANK OF INDIA, KRISHNA PLAZA, NAGARAMPALEM, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY ITS REGIONAL MANAGER MR. KUNDANLAL 3. UNION BANK OF INDIA, HAVING ITS BRANCH OFFICE AT ARUNDALPET, NARASARAOPET - 522601, PALANDAU DISTRICT REPRESENT BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER MISS. ANUJA ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the Conternnors. Ito 3/ Respondets 1 to 3 for wilfully and delibarately violated the orders dated 01.12.2022 in IA 1/2022 in WP 34550/2022 of Honourable High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi under section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Court 2 Act and under Artical 215 of the Constitution of India and pas such other order or orders may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. RAMA MOHAN RAO KOTHA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. K LAKSHMI NARASIMHA (SC FOR AB) 2. The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND CONTEMPT CASE No.1094 of 2023 ORDER: This Contempt Case has been filed complaining the willful disobedience of the respondents in implementing the order dated 01.12.2022 in I.A.No.1 of 2022 in W.P.No.34550 of 2022. 2. During the course of hearing today, both the learned counsels would submit that the order of the Court is complied with and hence, further adjudication in this case is not required. 3. In view of the above factual position, this Court is of the view that, no further adjudication is required in the present Contempt Case. 4. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. 5. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND Date: 26.12.2025 SJ 4 22 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND CONTEMPT CASE No.1094 of 2023 Dt.26.12.2025 SJ