Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 59312 (AP)

Mr.Shaik Nurul Ameen v. The Chief General Manager (HRD), A.P. Southern Power

WA/1579/2008 · 2025-12-28

A Hari Haranadha Sarma, Battu Devanand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010287842008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3545] MONDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA WRIT APPEAL NO: 1579/2008 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 20-07-2007 in WP No. 12180/2007 Between: 1.MR.SHAIK NURUL AMEEN, S/O.ABDUL AZIZ, UNEMPLOYEE, R/O. D.NO. 2-28-17, SRILAKSHMI NILAYAM, NEAR COMMUNIST PARTY OFFICE, BESIDE GATI TRANSPORT, RANGANAYAKULU STREET, GANDHINAGAR, TENALI, ...APPELLANT AND 1.THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER HRD A P SOUTHERN POWER, DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD., THIRUPATHI. 2.THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER OPERATION CIRCLE, A.P. SOUTHERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD., 4/7, BRODIPET, GUNTUR. 3.A P SOUTHERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD REP BY, ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, TIRUAPTHI. ...RESPONDENT(S): IA NO: 1 OF 2008(WAMP 656 OF 2008 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 79 days in resubmitting the Writ Appeal in the interest of justice. 2 IA NO: 2 OF 2008(WAMP 657 OF 2008 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 108 days in filing the Writ Appeal in the interestofjustice. IA NO: 3 OF 2008(WAMP 3094 OF 2008 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.1 to consider the case of the petitioner for appointment to the post of LDC/TYPIST by suspending the proceedings Lr.no. CGM/HRD/DS/AS-III/PO.VII/D.No. 71/07, dt. 02-02-2007 passed by the respondent No.1 in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Appellant: 1.K JAGADISHWAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.P R BALARAMI REDDY(SC FOR AP TRANSCO) The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA WRIT APPEAL NO.1579 of 2008 JUDGMENT : (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand) On 12.08.2025 and 17.11.2025, there was no representation for the appellant and to give one more opportunity to the appellant, this appeal was posted to today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Today also, there is no representation for the appellant. Hence, it appears that the appellant has no interest to prosecute the case. 2. Accordingly, the Writ Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND __________________________________ JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA Date : 29.12.2025 SAB 4 123 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA WRIT APPEAL NO: 1579 of 2008 Date : 29.12.2025 SAB