HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 18624 of 2025 Court No. - 65 HON'BLE DR. GAUTAM CHOWDHARY, J. 1. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant and perused the record. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that there is allegation against the applicant that he committed rape of the daughter of the informant, but during course of trial the victim (P.W.2) in her testimony deposed at the trial has not supported the prosecution case and she has been declared hostile, which statement has been filed as Annexure No. S.A.1 to the supplementary affidavit filed today. Thus, it is argued that there is bleak chance that prosecution may prove its case beyond reasonable doubt and the applicant may be convicted. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed before the Court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused have also been mentioned. It has also been assured on behalf of the applicant that he is ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make himself available before the court whenever required and is also ready to accept all the conditions which the Court may deem fit to impose upon him. He next submits that applicant is languishing in jail since 08.03.2025. 4. Per contra, learned A.G.A. as well as learned counsel for the informant have opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant by contending that innocence of the applicant cannot be adjudged before conclusion of trial, therefore, he does not deserve any indulgence, but he has not disputed that the victim in her testimony has not supported the prosecution case during the course of trial and she has been declared hostile. 5. Considering the overall facts and circumstances, the nature of Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Kamlendra Singh Jadaun, Vijeta Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Prabhakar Pal Yogendra Singh Tomar .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) allegations, the gravity of offence and without expressing any opinion on merits, this Court finds it to be a fit case for bail. Accordingly, the bail application stands allowed. 6. Let the applicant-Yogendra Singh Tomar, be enlarged on bail in Case Crime No. 29 of 2025, under Sections 64(2)K, 87, 89, 115(2), 123, 127(2), 351(3), 352 of B.N.S., Police Station- Marhara, District- Etah, on executing a personal bond and furnishing two local sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: i) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence. ii) The applicant shall not threaten or harass the prosecution witnesses. iii) The applicant shall appear on the date fixed by the trial court. iv) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which the applicant is accused, or suspected of the commission. v) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade such person from disclosing facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. 7. In case of default of any of the conditions enumerated above, the court concerned shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of applicant in accordance with law. October 10, 2025 Mustaqeem. BAIL No. 18624 of 2025 2 (Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD MUSTAQEEM KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad