Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 59303 (KAR)

SRI. RANGANATHA S/O HANAMANT KABADAD v. THE MANAGING IDRECTOR (A AND HR)

WP/107705/2025 · 2025-12-15

M Nagaprasanna

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:18213 WP No. 107705 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 107705 OF 2025 (S-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. RANGANATHA S/O HANAMANT KABADAD AGE: 34 YEARS, OCC. NIL, R/O: NAKARGUNDI, POST: SORAKOPPA, TALUK: BAGALKOT, DIST: BAGALKOT 587102 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHASWATH HIREMATH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR (A AND HR) BENGALURU ELECTRICITY, SUPPLY COMPANY LTD., BESCOM, K R CIRCLE, BENGALURU 560001 2. THE GENERAL MANAGER (HRD) KARNATAKA POWER TRANSMISSION, CORPORATION LIMITED (KPTCL) Digitally signed by VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:18213 WP No. 107705 of 2025 CAUVERY BHAVAN, K G ROAD, BENGALURU 560009 3. THE CHAIRMAN RECRUITMENT AND SELECTION COMMITTEE, BESCOM, K R CIRCLE, BENGALURU 560001 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B.S. KAMAT, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS, OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER, OR DIRECTION, DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONER DATED 11/09/2025 VIDE ANNEXURE – E AND PERMIT HIM TO ATTEND THE MEDICAL EXAMINATION AFRESH FOR THE POST OF JUNIOR POWERMAN (NHK) UNDER NOTIFICATION NO. KPTCL/B16/44953/23-24 NKK DATED 14.10.2024 (ANNEUXRE – A) AND ETC., THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN B GROUP THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:18213 WP No. 107705 of 2025 ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed and the petition is thus rendered infructuous. 2. In the light of the said submission, the petition is disposed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE RSH/CT-CNB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 176