APHC010053472020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 3146/2020 Between: 1. THIMMAPATRUNI SURESH, , S/O. T. SURYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/O. H.NO.1-59, PEDAPADU VILLAGE, ACHUTHAPURAM MANDAL, THIMMARAJAPETA, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE- 531033. 2. THIMMAPATRUNI KASULA RATHAN,, W/O. T. SURYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/O. H.NO.1-59, PEDAPADU VILLAGE, ACHUTHAPURAM MANDAL, THIMMARAJAPETA, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE- 531033. 3. M. USHA BHAVANI, , W/O. M. BALAKRISHNARAJU, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, RIO. H.NO.1-59, PEDAPADU VILLAGE, ACHUTHAPURAM MANDAL, THIMMARAJAPETA, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE- 531033. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, , REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MAHILA POLICE STATION, PADMAVATHI NAGAR, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 3. T RAMYASREE, W/O. T. SURESH,C/O. BONDI RAMESH, GUMALAKSHMIPURAM TALUQ, PARVATHIPURAM, VIZIANAGARAM - 534423. 2 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus, declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in arresting the petitioners on the basis of complaint made by the 3rd respondent is illegal. arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the 2nd respondent not to arrest the petitioners, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To direct the 2nd respondent not to insisit the petitioners to sign on blank papers and arrest the petitioners, during the pendency of the petition of the Restitution of Conjugal Rights U/S 9 of Hindu Marriage Act Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. P VIJAYA KUMARI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus, declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in arresting the petitioners on the basis of complaint made by the 3rd respondent is illegal. arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the 2nd respondent not to arrest the petitioners, and pass...…” 2. Heard Ms.P.Vijaya Kumari, learned Counsel for the petitioners and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the relief has become infructuous in this matter. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader is in attendance. 5. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed since the relief has become infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 02.09.2025 MH 4 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 104 W.P.No.3146 of 2020 Dated.02.09.2025 MH