Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5929 (CHH)

SANDEEP KUMAR SAHU v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/1083/2018 · 2025-02-06

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:6934 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1083 of 2018 • Sandeep Kumar Sahu S/o Subhash Chandra Sahu, Aged About 39 Years Post - Block Program Manager At Community Health Centre District Janjgir Champa, Resident Of H.I.G. - II, 72, Housing Board Colony, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Health And Family Welfare, New Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Nawagarh, Janjgir Champa, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 3. Mission Director, National Health Mission, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4. Block Medical Officer, Nawagarh, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Ashutosh Shukla, Advocate For Respondents/State : Mr. Dashrath Prajapati, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 06/02/2025 1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- “10.1 The Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records. 10.2 That this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the impugned Termination order passed dated Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI 2 09/10/2017 (Annexure P/1) in favour of petitioner by the respondent. 10.3 That this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue direction to the respondent no. 2 to decide the representation/objection of the petitioner. 10.4 Cost of the petition may also be granted to the petitioner. 10.5 Pass such other and further orders as may be deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstance of the present case in the interest of justice.” 2. At the very outset, Mr. Ashutosh Shukla, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that by efflux of time, the present petition has become infructuous, therefore, this petition may be dismissed being rendered infructuous. 3. No objection from other side. 4. Recording the statement made by Mr. Ashutosh Shukla, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed being rendered infructuous. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti