APHC010053622004 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] TUESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI SECOND APPEAL NO: 1395/2004 Between: 1. GORRELA SUDHAKARA RAO, S/O. SURYANARAYANA BUSINESS R/O. ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, A.P. ...APPELLANT AND 1. THE ELURU MUNICIPAL COUNSEL, ELURU SPECIAL OFFICER THE SPECIAL OFFICER THE ELURU MUNICIPAL COUNSEL, ELURU, E.D.M.C. 2. GORRELA MAHESHWARAMMA, W/O. LATE SURYANARAYANA BUSINESS R/O. ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. GORRELA UMA MAHESHWARA RAO, S/O. LATE SURYANARAYANA BUSINESS R/O. ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. KOLA SARADA, W/O. MALLESWARA RAO BUSINESS R/O. ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. GORRELA BALAJI, S/O. LATE SURYANARAYANA BUSINESS R/O. ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 6. GORRELA PRASAD, S/O. LATE SURYANARAYANA BUSINESS R/O. ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 7. GORRELA MAHESH, S/O. LATE SURYANARAYANA BUSINESS R/O. ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Appellant: 1. V MANOHAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI SECOND APPEAL No.1395 OF 2004 J U D G M E N T: No representation on either side though the matter is posted under the caption “for dismissal”. There was no representation for the appellant today, as well as on the previous adjournment. 2. In that view of the matter, the Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI 01.04.2025 Pmk 10 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI SECOND APPEAL No.1395 OF 2004 Date:01.04.2025 Pmk