Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5929 (ALL)

M/S CIPLA LTD v. SHRI ANIL TOMAR

WRIC/523/2025 · 2025-09-16

Prakash Padia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 523 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, a detailed order was passed by this Court on 05.05.2025:- "1. Heard Sri Piyush Bhargava, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Gaurav Srivasavata, learned counsel for respondent No.1/Anil Tomar/Workman. 2. The order dated 25.07.2024 passed by the presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal(1) U.P. Prayagraj in Adjudication Case No.08 of 2018 is under challenge. By the aforesaid order, a direction was given to reinstate the petitioner in service and also make payment of 25% of the back wages for the period the petitioner was out of employment. 3. After hearing counsel for the parties at length, a direction was given by this Court on 22.04.2025 to settle the matter outside of Court by way of negotiations. 4. Pursuant to the aforesaid, It is argued by Sri Gaurav Srivastava, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the workmen that the respondent-workman is ready and willing not to contest the matter any further and forego the relief of reinstatement in case, the petitioner will make payment of 25% back wages as directed by the Labour Court vide its award dated 25.07.2024. It is argued that as per calculation made by the workmen, he is entitled for a sum of Rupees Thirteen Lacs Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Piyush Bhargava Counsel for Respondent(s) : Gaurav Srivastava, C.S.C. M/S Cipla Ltd .....Petitioner(s) Shri Anil Tomar And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) and Odds but in case, the petitioner will make payment for a sum of Rupees Ten Lacs, he will not contest the matter any further. 5. As prayed by learned counsel for the respondent-workmen, two weeks time is granted to file affidavit in this regard. 6. List on 21.05.2025. 7. It is made clear that the matter will be taken up after recess. 8. Till then the respondent No.1/workman will not proceed to execute the award dated 25.07.2024. " 2. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, a settlement affidavit has been filed on behalf of respondent no.2 before this Court. The same is taken on record. 3. Office is directed to allot regular number to the aforesaid affidavit. 4. It is stated in paragraph no.11 of the affidavit that pursuant to the order passed by this Court, negotiation had taken place between the parties. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner had handed over a Bank Draft of Rs.10 lacs to the respondent no.1- Anil Tomar (workman). 6. In view of the above, since the settlement has already been made between the parties, no further orders are required to be passed. 7. It is made clear that the parties will not go ahead future in the matter pursuant to the aforesaid award in further before any authority whatsoever. 8. With the above, the petition is disposed of. September 17, 2025 S.K. WRIC No. 523 of 2025 2 (Prakash Padia,J.) Digitally signed by :- SWEETY KANOJIA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SYED MOHAMMAD SAQLAIN HAIDER High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SWEETY KANOJIA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad