HARYANA SHEHRI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN AND ANOTHER v. ANITA AND OTHERS
CR/3024/2025 · 2025-05-19
Anil Kshetarpal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 59286 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 59286 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CR-3024-2025 (O&M) -1- 148 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR-3024-2025 (O&M) Date of decision : 19.05.2025 Haryana Shehri Vikas Pradhikaran and another ...Petitioners Vs. Smt. Anita and others
...Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL Present: Mr. Amit Jaiswal, Advocate for the petitioner. *** ANIL KSHETARPAL
, J.
(Oral)
1. The petitioner herein is a Public Sector Undertaking controlled and owned by State of Haryana. On account of failure to file the written statement and payment of cost, its defence has been struck off.
2.
Learned counsel representing the petitioners submits that the relevant record was not traceable, hence, the written statement could not be filed. He further submits that the plaintiff filed a writ petition i.e. CWP-11794- 2019, which is still pending.
3. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the impugned order passed on 18.02.2025 is modified while granting liberty to the petitioner to file its written statement within 15 days on payment of cost of Rs. 5,000/-, which shall be in addition to the cost of Rs.1,000/-, which was ordered by the trial Court. The
order has been passed without issuing notice to the respondent No.1, hence, she will have liberty to file an application for recall. NEERAJ 2025.05.21 11:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CR-3024-2025 (O&M) -2-
4. The revision petition is disposed of.
5. All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are also
disposed of.
(ANIL KSHETARPAL) 19.05.2025
JUDGE neeraj Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes No Whether Reportable : Yes No NEERAJ 2025.05.21 11:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document