APHC010539972024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 28807/2024 Between: 1. KODURU SANKARA RAO, S/O K. RAMA RAO, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC AGRICUITURIST, R/O NEDIGATTU VIILAGE, RAMAYOGI AGRAHARAM, BHEEMUNIPATNAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 2. KODURU KANAKA RAJU,, S/O K. APPA RAO, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURIST, R/O NEDIGATTU VILLAGE, RAMAYOGI AGRAHARAM, BHEEMUNIPATNAM MANDAI, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 3. KODURU KRISHNA RAO,, S/O LATE K. APPA RAO, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, OCC AGRICUITURIST, R/O NEDIGATTU VILLAGE, RAMAYOGI AGRAHARAM, BHEEMUNIPATNAM MANDAI, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POIICE, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, BHEEMUNIPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 4. SARADINDU CHAKRAVARTHI, S/O S.K. CHAKRAVARTHI, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O D. NO. 7-1-41/2, KIRLAMPUDI LAYOUT, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. D.GAYATHRI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. KALEEMULLA S 2. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 2 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of Respondent No. 3 and their staff interfering and trying to dispossess the petitioner from the private land to an extent of Ac.7.42 Cents out of Ac.8.20 Cents in Sy. No. 13/2 of Ramayogi, Agraharam Village, Bheemunipatnam Mandal, Visakhapatnam District and consequently direct the respondent No.3 and their staff not to interfere and dispossess the petitioner from a private land to an extent of Ac.7.42 Cents out of Ac.8.20 Cents in Sy. No. 13/2 of Ramayogi, Agraharam Village, Bheemunipatnam Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.” 2. Ms.D.Gayathri, learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that, it is a case of interference of Police in the civil matter. Learned counsel would further submit that, under the influence of the unofficial Respondents, the Police are trying to dispossess the Petitioners from the subject property. 3. Sri P.Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the Police neither interfered in the civil disputes between the parties nor pressurized the Petitioners to vacate the subject land. 4. Sri S. Kaleemulla, learned counsel for the unofficial Respondents is in attendance. 5. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, Police are directed not to interfere with the civil disputes between the parties, except under due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:30.12.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.28807 of 2024 Dt.30.12.2025 Dinesh