BANDENAWAZ RAJESAB JAMAKHANDI v. SURESH PRAKASH PUJER
MFA/22372/2013 · 2025-11-17
Chillakur Sumalatha
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 59275 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 59275 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15619 MFA No. 22372 of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 22372 OF 2013 (MV-I) BETWEEN:
BANDENAWAZ S/O. RAJESAB JAMAKHANDI, AGE: 06 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT, SINCE, MINOR R/BY HIS NATURAL FATHER AS M/G RAJESAB KALESAB JAMKHANDI, AGE: 28 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE & COOLIE, R/O: MUDALAGI, TQ: GOKAK, DIST: BELGAUM. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. SANTOSH S. HATTIKATAGI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SURESH S/O. PRAKASH PUJER, AGE: 26 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O: DHARMATTI, TQ: GOKAK, DIST: BELGAUM.
2. MALLESH S/O. SHIVALINGAPPA MUGALKHOD, AGE: MAJOR, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O: GURLAPUR, TQ: GOKAK, DIST: BELGAUM .
3.
THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., BY ITS SENIOR DIVISIONAL MANAGER, MADIWALE ARCADE, 2ND FLOOR, CLUB ROAD, BELGAUM. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. S.V. YAJI, ADVOCATE FOR R3;
NOTICE TO R1 AND R2 SERVED)
GIRIJA A. BYAHATTI Digitally signed by GIRIJA A. BYAHATTI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DHARWAD
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15619 MFA No. 22372 of 2013
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MOTOR VEHICLES ACT PRAYING TO MODIFY THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD PASSED BY THE FAST TRACK AND M.A.C.T., HUKKERI, SITTING AT GOKAK IN M.V.C. NO.2713/2011 DATED 17-04-2013 AND AWARD THE COMPENSATION AS PRAYED FOR IN THE CLAIM PETITION BY ALLOWING THIS APPEAL, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA)
No representation on appellant’s side on call.
There was no representation even on 08.10.2025 and
07.11.2025. Though the matter is listed on this day under the caption ‘for Dismissal’, yet there is no representation. Therefore, the appeal stands dismissed for non- prosecution.
SD/- (CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE gab CT-MCK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 15