APHC010331232024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] MONDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3250/2024 Between: 1. E.UMADEVI,, WIFE OF T.RAMANAIAH, AGED 31 YEARS, NAVAVARAM VILLAGE, CHITVEL MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT, (ERSTWHILE YSR KADAPA DISTRICT) ...PETITIONER AND 1. D SASIKALA, The Project Director, Women Development and Child welfare Department, Rayachoti, Annamayya District. (Erstwhile YSR Kadapa District) ...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to summon the Respondent herein and punish them for their willful, blatant and utter violation of the order dated 17- 04- 2023 passed by his Lordship Sri. Justice Nimmagadda Venkateswarlu of this Honble High Court in W.P.No. 9191 of 2023, which attracts Sec. 10 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SATYANARAYANA NIMMALA Counsel for the Contemnor: 1. G RAJU The Court made the following: 2 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3250/2024 ORDER: This contempt case is filed against the respondent for willful disobedience of the orders dated 17.04.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.9191 of 2023. When the matter is taken up for hearing, both the learned counsel represents that in compliance of the order of this Court, the respondent considered the representation of the petitioner and passed a speaking order rejecting the claim of the petitioner. Further, learned counsel for the petitioner requested to grant liberty to challenge the said speaking order. Considering the submissions made by both the learned counsel, since the respondent passed a speaking order in compliance of the order of this Court, no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to challenge the said speaking order by initiating appropriate proceedings. No order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 29.12.2025 TTPPSS 3 27 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA (closed) CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3250/2024 29.12.2025 TTPPSS